Facultatea de Drepthttp://dspace.usm.md:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/62024-03-27T16:24:48Z2024-03-27T16:24:48ZCONTESTAREA ACTELOR EXECUTORULUI JUDECĂTORESCBotnari, Veaceslavhttp://dspace.usm.md:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/146912024-03-27T14:28:35Z2024-01-01T00:00:00ZCONTESTAREA ACTELOR EXECUTORULUI JUDECĂTORESC
Botnari, Veaceslav
The purpose of this paper is to study the remedies provided by law for the parties in a civil
enforcement procedure to defend their rights. Like any other activity, the actions of the people involved in the enforcement procedure, including the bailiff, may sometimes infringe the rights of other persons. For these reasons there must be provided an efficient mechanism to those who claim the violation of their rights by the acts or actions/inactions of the bailiff. In order to achieve the above mentioned goal of this paper, the author has thoroughly study normative provisions and opinions of the national researchers dedicated to this subject. It was established that the parties and participants of the enforcement procedure as well as affected third parties can challenge the actions and documents of the bailiff in court, which has the authority to cancel it. This is an adequate remedy that offers sufficient security for all the involved parties.
BOTNARU, Veaceslav. Contestarea actelor executorului judecătoresc. În: Integrare prin cercetare și inovare: conferința științifică națională cu participare internațională. Științe juridice și economice, 9 -10 noiembrie 2023. CEP USM, 2024, pp.510-516. ISBN 978-9975-62-693-4 (PDF).
2024-01-01T00:00:00ZDECLARAREA INADMISIBILITĂȚII ACȚIUNII ÎN CONTENCIOSUL ADMINISTRATIV ȘI REFUZUL DE A PRIMI CEREREA DE CHEMARE ÎN JUDECATĂ CA EFECTE PROCESUALE DUBLATEPrisac, Alexandruhttp://dspace.usm.md:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/146902024-03-27T14:19:31Z2024-01-01T00:00:00ZDECLARAREA INADMISIBILITĂȚII ACȚIUNII ÎN CONTENCIOSUL ADMINISTRATIV ȘI REFUZUL DE A PRIMI CEREREA DE CHEMARE ÎN JUDECATĂ CA EFECTE PROCESUALE DUBLATE
Prisac, Alexandru
In this article, two effects of the violation of the rules of the court's general jurisdiction were analyzed: the declaration of the inadmissibility of the action in the administrative litigation and the refusal to receive the summons request. These two procedural effects may have other grounds for their birth, but they have been analyzed from the perspective of the violation of the rules of general competence because they have the most tangents between them and to prove that they are essentially the same. In order to prove the similarity of these two procedural effects, both the provisions of the Administrative Code of the Republic of Moldova and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova were analyzed. The introduction of the notion of declaring the action
inadmissible in administrative litigation into the Administrative Code of the Republic of Moldova was criticized. Finally, it was proposed to exclude it from the Administrative Code of the Republic of Moldova.
2024-01-01T00:00:00ZCONFLICTUL DE INTERESEFetescu, Andrianhttp://dspace.usm.md:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/146892024-03-27T14:08:05Z2024-01-01T00:00:00ZCONFLICTUL DE INTERESE
Fetescu, Andrian
The very term ”interest”itself represents the concern of the individual to achieve a success, a advantage of any kind to satisfy certain personal needs. To understand more well the notion of personal interest is necessary, in advance to understand the differences between the notions of public interest and personal interest. Therefore, by “public interest” is meant that interest which involves the guarantee and respect by the state authorities of the rule of law and constitutional democracy, a rights, freedoms and fundamental duties of citizens, as well as satisfaction community needs.
FETESCU, Andrian. Conflictul de interese. În: Integrare prin cercetare și inovare: conferința științifică națională cu participare internațională. Științe juridice și economice, 9 -10 noiembrie 2023. CEP USM, 2024, pp.500-504. ISBN 978-9975-62-693-4 (PDF).
2024-01-01T00:00:00ZVÂNZAREA BUNURILOR ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE SILITĂNovicov, OxanaTalmaci, Romanhttp://dspace.usm.md:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/146882024-03-27T13:59:02Z2024-01-01T00:00:00ZVÂNZAREA BUNURILOR ÎN PROCEDURA DE EXECUTARE SILITĂ
Novicov, Oxana; Talmaci, Roman
Foreclosure involves the pursuit of assets and income in order to restore the creditor’s
rights. Most often, the pursued assets will be sold by the bailiff in order to satisfy the creditors from the money obtained. This process is often arduous, causing the debtor to resist. The authors analyzed the regulations of the Enforcement Code of the Republic of Moldova that apply to the forced sale of goods. The article identifies the ways of organizing the forced sale of goods, depending on the nature of the good, and also analyzes the procedures applicable to each type of sale. The authors pay special attention to the organization of forced auctions, identifying certain problematic regulatory aspects and analyzing their practical applicability.
NOVICOV, Oxana, TALMACI, Roman. Vânzarea bunurilor în procedura de executare silită. În: Integrare prin cercetare și inovare: conferința științifică națională cu participare internațională. Științe juridice și economice, 9 -10 noiembrie 2023. CEP USM, 2024, pp.492-499. ISBN 978-9975-62-693-4 (PDF).
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z